另一方面.批评者有时指责公司滥用广告误导我们- accuse sb. of doing sth. 指控.指责某人- He accused me of neglecting my duty. 他指责我玩忽职守. 经常与介词of 搭配的动词短语: accuse sb. of sth./doing sth. remind sb. of sth. 使某人想起某事 cure sb. of sth. rob sb. of sth. assure sb. of 向-保证,使-相信 inform sb. of 把-告诉-,告以- warn sb. of 警告 suspect sb. of 对-怀疑 Fill in the blanks with the proper phrases.1. The teacher the student cheating in the examination. 查看更多

 

题目列表(包括答案和解析)

       In so many ways, cyberspace(网络空间) mirrors the real world.People ask for information, play games, and share hobby tips.Others buy and sell products.Still others look for friendship, or even love.

       Some Internet users want more than just someone to chat with.They’re looking for serious love relationships.Is cyberspace a good place to find love? That answer depends on whom you ask.Some of these relationships actually succeed.Others end in tears.

       Unlike the real world, however, your knowledge about a person is limited to words on a computer screen.Identity and appearance mean very little in cyberspace.Rather, a person’s thoughts or at least the thoughts they type are what really counts.So even the shyest person can become a chat-room star.

       Usually, this “faceless” communication doesn’t create problems.Identity doesn’t really matter when you’re in a chat-room discussing politics or hobbies.In fact, this emphasis on the ideas themselves makes the Internet a great place for exciting conversation.Where else can so many people come together to chat?

       Supporters of online relationships claim that the Internet allows couples to know how intelligent they are first.Personal appearance doesn’t get in the way.

       But critics(批评者)of online relationships argue that no one can truly know another person in cyberspace.Why? Because the Internet gives users a lot of control over how others view them.Internet users can carefully choose their words to fit whatever image they want to give.And they don’t have to worry about what their “non-verbal ” communication is doing for their image.In a sense, they’re not really themselves.All of this may be fine if the relationship stays in cyberspace.But not knowing a person is a big problem in a love relationship.With so many unknowns, it’s easy to let one’s imagination “fill in the blanks”.This surely leads to disappointment when couples meet in person.How someone imagines an online friend is often quite different from the real person.

       So, before looking for love in cyberspace, remember the advice of Internet pioneer Clifford Stoll, “Life in the real world is far richer than anything you’ll find on a computer screen.”

Which would the critics of online relationships most probably disagree to?

       A.Nobody can truly know another person in cyberspace.

       B.Internet users can choose words to create any image they like.

       C.The Internet allows couples know how intelligent they are.

       D.In a sense, Internet users are not really themselves.

Even the shyest person can become a chat-room star because what really counts is a person’s ______.

       A.non-verbal communication    B.thoughts typed on the screen

       C.knowledge and appearance    D.identity shown in the chat

The underlined word “This” (Paragraph 6) refers to ______.

       A.having exciting conversations online

       B.forming personal relationship in cyberspace

       C.imagining online friends with so many unknowns

       D.knowing a person in a love relationship

What’s the writer’s attitude towards finding love in cyberspace?

       A.Positive         B.Negative        C.Interested      D.Disinterested

查看答案和解析>>

         In so many ways, cyberspace(网络空间) mirrors the real world.People ask for information, play games, and share hobby tips.Others buy and sell products.Still others look for friendship, or even love.

         Some Internet users want more than just someone to chat with.They’re looking for serious love relationships.Is cyberspace a good place to find love? That answer depends on whom you ask.Some of these relationships actually succeed.Others end in tears.

         Unlike the real world, however, your knowledge about a person is limited to words on a computer screen.Identity and appearance mean very little in cyberspace.Rather, a person’s thoughts or at least the thoughts they type are what really counts.So even the shyest person can become a chat-room star.

         Usually, this “faceless” communication doesn’t create problems.Identity doesn’t really matter when you’re in a chat-room discussing politics or hobbies.In fact, this emphasis on the ideas themselves makes the Internet a great place for exciting conversation.Where else can so many people come together to chat?

         Supporters of online relationships claim that the Internet allows couples to know how intelligent they are first.Personal appearance doesn’t get in the way.

         But critics(批评者)of online relationships argue that no one can truly know another person in cyberspace.Why? Because the Internet gives users a lot of control over how others view them.Internet users can carefully choose their words to fit whatever image they want to give.And they don’t have to worry about what their “non-verbal ” communication is doing for their image.In a sense, they’re not really themselves.All of this may be fine if the relationship stays in cyberspace.But not knowing a person is a big problem in a love relationship.With so many unknowns, it’s easy to let one’s imagination “fill in the blanks”.This surely leads to disappointment when couples meet in person.How someone imagines an online friend is often quite different from the real person.

         So, before looking for love in cyberspace, remember the advice of Internet pioneer Clifford Stoll, “Life in the real world is far richer than anything you’ll find on a computer screen.”

1.Which would the critics of online relationships most probably disagree to?

         A.Nobody can truly know another person in cyberspace.

         B.Internet users can choose words to create any image they like.

         C.The Internet allows couples know how intelligent they are.

         D.In a sense, Internet users are not really themselves.

2.Even the shyest person can become a chat-room star because what really counts is a person’s ______.

         A.non-verbal communication     B.thoughts typed on the screen

         C.knowledge and appearance    D.identity shown in the chat

3.The underlined word “This” (Paragraph 6) refers to ______.

         A.having exciting conversations online

         B.forming personal relationship in cyberspace

         C.imagining online friends with so many unknowns

         D.knowing a person in a love relationship

4.What’s the writer’s attitude towards finding love in cyberspace?

         A.Positive           B.Negative         C.Interested      D.Disinterested

 

查看答案和解析>>

“I like your smile, but unlike you put your shoes on my face”. A charming way of saying “Keep off the grass”. But could you figure it out? Or this: “Wash Clothing Store” for laundry.

They are both typical Chinglish, a combination of English vocabulary and Chinese grammar. Expressions such as “people mountain people sea”, means extremely crowded, and “give you some color to see”, meaning a punishment, are widely known and recognized.

Chinglish has been attracting global attention in recent years as China grows rapidly in status on the world stage, attracting both fans and detractors(批评者).

The Beijing Speaks Foreign Languages Programme and English First China Company, a language trainer known as EF Education, jointly launched a campaign to root out poor grammar and misused vocabulary in downtown Beijing. They argue Chinglish is an embarrassment that we should let it die out at all costs.

“It is meaningful to allow the capital to show its most beautiful historical and cultural heritage to the world." Michael Lu, vice-president of EF Education said, “since the launching of the campaign, foreign teachers and students had been very keen to volunteer participation.”He believed signs were very important in public services. "The signs in some old buildings confused foreign visitors.

Chinglish, although the target of much criticism, has also won supporters who regard it as an interesting way for foreigners to learn how Chinese people think and express themselves.

“Many Chinglish logos carry Chinese elements and they will enrich the English language,” 32-year-old Oliver Radtke said. He had even published a book “Chinglish: Found in Translation,” on the subject. About 50,000 copies of the book have been sold since it was published in 2007.

Some Chinese university experts also side with Chinglish. "English has absorbed elements from other languages such as French and Spanish in its growth, and the emergence of Chinglish again testifies(说明) to the language’s vitality and inclusiveness," said Shi Anbin, an associate professor of Tsinghua University.

1.How did Chinglish come into being?

A. Chinese people misunderstood the meaning of the new words.

B. Chinese people combined English vocabulary with Chinese grammar.

C. Chinese people based their English on the native English speakers.

D. Chinese people make wide use of English vocabulary with bad spelling.

2.What Shi Anbin said means       .

A. there are many French and Spanish words in English

B. English is the language with vitality and inclusiveness

C. Chinglish enriches English and shouldn’t be got rid of

D. Chinglish has greater effect on English than French and Spanish

3.According to Oliver Radtke, Chinglish       .

A. shows how Chinese people think

B. does damage to the English language

C. shows the great humor of Chinese people

D. should be sold to all over the world

 

查看答案和解析>>

 

       In so many ways, cyberspace(网络空间) mirrors the real world.People ask for information, play games, and share hobby tips.Others buy and sell products.Still others look for friendship, or even love.

       Some Internet users want more than just someone to chat with.They’re looking for serious love relationships.Is cyberspace a good place to find love? That answer depends on whom you ask.Some of these relationships actually succeed.Others end in tears.

       Unlike the real world, however, your knowledge about a person is limited to words on a computer screen.Identity and appearance mean very little in cyberspace.Rather, a person’s thoughts or at least the thoughts they type are what really counts.So even the shyest person can become a chat-room star.

       Usually, this “faceless” communication doesn’t create problems.Identity doesn’t really matter when you’re in a chat-room discussing politics or hobbies.In fact, this emphasis on the ideas themselves makes the Internet a great place for exciting conversation.Where else can so many people come together to chat?

       Supporters of online relationships claim that the Internet allows couples to know how intelligent they are first.Personal appearance doesn’t get in the way.

       But critics(批评者)of online relationships argue that no one can truly know another person in cyberspace.Why? Because the Internet gives users a lot of control over how others view them.Internet users can carefully choose their words to fit whatever image they want to give.And they don’t have to worry about what their “non-verbal ” communication is doing for their image.In a sense, they’re not really themselves.All of this may be fine if the relationship stays in cyberspace.But not knowing a person is a big problem in a love relationship.With so many unknowns, it’s easy to let one’s imagination “fill in the blanks”.This surely leads to disappointment when couples meet in person.How someone imagines an online friend is often quite different from the real person.

       So, before looking for love in cyberspace, remember the advice of Internet pioneer Clifford Stoll, “Life in the real world is far richer than anything you’ll find on a computer screen.”

1.Which would the critics of online relationships most probably disagree to?

       A.Nobody can truly know another person in cyberspace.

       B.Internet users can choose words to create any image they like.

       C.The Internet allows couples know how intelligent they are.

       D.In a sense, Internet users are not really themselves.

2.Even the shyest person can become a chat-room star because what really counts is a person’s ______.

       A.non-verbal communication                  B.thoughts typed on the screen

       C.knowledge and appearance                  D.identity shown in the chat

3.The underlined word “This” (Paragraph 6) refers to ______.

       A.having exciting conversations online

       B.forming personal relationship in cyberspace

       C.imagining online friends with so many unknowns

       D.knowing a person in a love relationship

4.What’s the writer’s attitude towards finding love in cyberspace?

       A.Positive             B.Negative            C.Interested         D.Disinterested

 

查看答案和解析>>

阅读理解

  Animal lovers should stop calling their furry or feathered friends “pets” because the word is insulting, leading academics claim.

  Domestic dogs, cats or hamsters(仓鼠)should be renamed as “companion animals” while owners should be known as “human carers”, they insist.Even words such as wildlife are dismissed as insulting to the animals concerned-who should instead be known as “free-living”, the academics including an Oxford professor suggest.

  The call comes from the editors of Journal of Animal Ethics, a new academic publication devoted to the issue.In its first editorial, the journal disapproves the use of words such as “critters(动物)” and “beasts”.It argues that “derogatory” language about animals can affect the way that they are treated.

  “Despite its popularity, ‘pets' is surely a derogatory word both of the animals concerned and their human carers,” the editorial claims.“Again the word ‘owners', though technically correct in law, goes back to a previous age when animals were regarded just as property, machines or things to use.”

  It goes on:“We invite authors to use the words ‘free-living' or ‘free-roaming' rather than ‘wild animals'.For most, ‘wildness' is very closely associated with uncivilized, rough existence.There is an obvious prejudice here that should be avoided.”

  The editors also hope to see some of the more colorful words in the English language stamped out.Phrases such as “sly(狡猾的)as a fox”, “eat like a pig” or “drunk as a skunk(臭鼬)” are all unfair to animals, they claim.“We shall not be able to think clearly unless we discipline ourselves to use less than partial adjectives in our exploration of animals and our moral relations with them,” they say.

(1)

According to the academics, what should we call domestic parrots?

[  ]

A.

human carers

B.

free-living

C.

companion animals

D.

beasts

(2)

The underlined word in paragraph 3 probably means ________.

[  ]

A.

不敬的,贬低的

B.

批评的,指责的

C.

不恰当的,不合适的

D.

令人不快的,不吉利的

(3)

Why do the editors say phrases like “sly as a fox” are unfair to animals?

[  ]

A.

Because foxes are not sly at all in real world.

B.

Because it is helpless for people to think clearly when using those phrases.

C.

Because those phrases have been stamped out.

D.

Because they are only partial adjectives in the description of animals.

(4)

What is the main idea of this passage?

[  ]

A.

Pets are badly treated because people use insulting words when calling them.

B.

Academics claim that calling animals “pets” is insulting.

C.

People should rename our pets with more colorful words.

D.

People shall not be able to realize the importance unless they discipline themselves.

(5)

In which part of a magazine can we most probably find this article?

[  ]

A.

Society and the Arts

B.

Business reports

C.

Current affairs

D.

Anecdotes

查看答案和解析>>


同步练习册答案