练习册

  • 练习册
  • 试题
    精英家教网 > 高中英语 > 题目详情

    This is John Roberts reporting from Cardiff. The result of the match which finished at four this afternoon between France and Wales was a draw. Neither side scored. The Dutch referee（裁判）did not allow the one goal which France managed to kick. The reason for this was that a French player was unfortunately off side. So both teams went home disappointed with the game. They particularly admired the French forwards, who were always fast and often threatened the Welsh defense. Once it looked as if the Welsh goalkeeper was in serious trouble. He dived to his right to save a shot from the French centre forward and crashed his head against the goal post. A doctor examined him and he soon began to play again. Of course the large, friendly crowd cheered for him. Wales will certainly welcome another visit from this splendid team.

    1. 1.

      This passage is__________.

      1. A.
        a piece of sports news broadcast over radio
      2. B.
        a piece of sports news in a newspaper
      3. C.
        an advertisement about sports
      4. D.
        an essay about sports
    2. 2.

      The underlined word “draw” in this passage means ?

      1. A.
        An act of pulling.
      2. B.
        Taking money from a bank.
      3. C.
        A state in which neither side wins.
      4. D.
        Making pictures with a pencil or a pen.
    3. 3.

      Which of the following sentence is NOT TRUE according to the passage?

      1. A.
        The French team is a visiting team while the Welsh team is the home team.
      2. B.
        The French goalkeeper was brave and he didn’t quit the match even after he had his head seriously injured in the game.
      3. C.
        People liked the French forwards for they were very active on the field.
      4. D.
        A French player did kick a goal but the referee refused to admit it.
    ACB
    1.推理判断题。从文中第一段第1句的reporting可知。
    2.词义猜测题。根据后面的 “neither side scored”可知。
    3.正误判断题。从文中可知，受伤的不是法国守门 员。
    练习册系列答案
    年级 高中课程 年级 初中课程
    高一 高一免费课程推荐！ 初一 初一免费课程推荐！
    高二 高二免费课程推荐！ 初二 初二免费课程推荐！
    高三 高三免费课程推荐！ 初三 初三免费课程推荐！
    相关习题

    科目：高中英语 来源： 题型：阅读理解

      Just five minutes of exercise a day outdoors can improve mental health, according to a study.

       Researchers from the University of Essex, UK have found that as little as five minutes of a “green activity” such as walking, gardening, cycling or farming could help to improve mood and increase self-esteem (自信).

      Many studies have shown that outdoor exercise can reduce the risk of mental illness and improve a sense of well-being, but the new study, led by Jules Pretty and Jo Barton, was the first to determine how much time needed to be spent on green exercise for the benefits to show.

       Barton and Pretty looked at data from 1,252 people of different ages, genders (性别) and mental health status (情况) taken from 10 studies in Britain.

       They analyzed their different outdoor activities including walking, gardening, cycling, fishing, boating, horse-riding and farming in locations such as a park, garden or nature trail (路径).

       They found that the mental health changes were seen after just five minutes. With longer periods of time exercising in a green environment, the positive effects were more apparent.

       Looking at men and women of different ages, the researchers found the health changes were particularly strong in the young and the mentally ill.

       Green and blue

       A bigger effect was seen with exercise in an area that also contained water – such as a lake or river.

      “This is because historically we are drawn to water to survive and it is in our genetic (遗传的) make-up to be at one with nature,” the researchers wrote in their report.

       Pretty said those who were generally inactive, or stressed, or with mental illness would probably benefit the most from “green exercise”.

       “Employers, for example, could encourage staff in stressful workplaces to take a short walk at lunchtime in the nearest park to improve mental health.”

       He also said exercise programs outdoors could benefit youth offenders.

    How is the study this article refers to different from other studies?

      A. It involved more people.

      B. It took longer to finish the research.

      C. It determined the exact amount of time needed.

      D. It was led by just two researchers.

    What can we conclude from the findings of the study?

      A. Just five minutes of “green exercise” daily can help improve mental health.

      B. Gardeners and farmers do not need “green exercise”.

      C. Walking in a park with a lake will weaken the effect.

      D. “Green exercise” is not suitable for the mentally ill.

    . According to Pretty, _______ would probably benefit the most from “green exercise”.

      A. stressed, inactive people B. office workers

      C. youth offenders            D. women and children

    What is the main problem discussed in this article?

      A. Physical well-being.       B. Outdoor exercise.

      C. Mental illness.            D. Harmony with nature.

    查看答案和解析>>

    科目：高中英语 来源：2010—2011学年四川攀枝花市米易中学高一月考英语卷 题型：阅读理解

      Just five minutes of exercise a day outdoors can improve mental health, according to a study.
    Researchers from the University of Essex, UK have found that as little as five minutes of a “green activity” such as walking, gardening, cycling or farming could help to improve mood and increase self-esteem (自信).
    Many studies have shown that outdoor exercise can reduce the risk of mental illness and improve a sense of well-being, but the new study, led by Jules Pretty and Jo Barton, was the first to determine how much time needed to be spent on green exercise for the benefits to show.
    Barton and Pretty looked at data from 1,252 people of different ages, genders (性别) and mental health status (情况) taken from 10 studies in Britain.
    They analyzed their different outdoor activities including walking, gardening, cycling, fishing, boating, horse-riding and farming in locations such as a park, garden or nature trail (路径).
    They found that the mental health changes were seen after just five minutes. With longer periods of time exercising in a green environment, the positive effects were more apparent.
    Looking at men and women of different ages, the researchers found the health changes were particularly strong in the young and the mentally ill.
    Green and blue
    A bigger effect was seen with exercise in an area that also contained water – such as a lake or river.
    “This is because historically we are drawn to water to survive and it is in our genetic (遗传的) make-up to be at one with nature,” the researchers wrote in their report.
    Pretty said those who were generally inactive, or stressed, or with mental illness would probably benefit the most from “green exercise”.
    “Employers, for example, could encourage staff in stressful workplaces to take a short walk at lunchtime in the nearest park to improve mental health.”
    He also said exercise programs outdoors could benefit youth offenders.
    【小题1】How is the study this article refers to different from other studies?

    A．It involved more people.
    B．It took longer to finish the research.
    C．It determined the exact amount of time needed.
    D．It was led by just two researchers.
    【小题2】 What can we conclude from the findings of the study?
    A．Just five minutes of “green exercise” daily can help improve mental health.
    B．Gardeners and farmers do not need “green exercise”.
    C．Walking in a park with a lake will weaken the effect.
    D．“Green exercise” is not suitable for the mentally ill.
    【小题3】. According to Pretty, _______ would probably benefit the most from “green exercise”.
    A．stressed, inactive peopleB．office workers
    C．youth offenders D．women and children
    【小题4】 What is the main problem discussed in this article?
    A．Physical well-being. B．Outdoor exercise.
    C．Mental illness. D．Harmony with nature.

    查看答案和解析>>

    科目：高中英语 来源：2014届河北衡水中学高三上期二调考试英语卷（解析版） 题型：阅读理解

    This year’s World Food Prize will honor two leaders of hunger-fighting groups based  in the United States. The winners are David Beckmann of Bread for the World and Jo Luck of Heifer International. They will share the prize of 250,000 dollars. The World Food Prize usually goes to researchers or top policy officials. This is the first time it will recognize the work of nongovernmental groups.

    Heifer International provides donated animals and training to farmers in 50 countries. Jo Luck remains president until next year. Under her leadership, the group’s budget grew from less than 10,000,000 dollars to more than 130,000,000 dollars. Jo Luck, “People pass on their gifts of not just animals but also gifts of training and leadership. We have seen cases where we have been gone 5 and 10 years and we go back and they have developed roads and built schools, and they have other communities receiving the animals and the training. You just give them those resources and that training and opportunity, and you cannot hold them back.” She told the story of a woman from a poor village in Zimbabwe. A family member helped send her to school in the United States with earnings from a donated milk goat. She received a doctoral degree. Jo Luck, “That is what a goat did. That is one example. The animal is only the catalyst（催化剂）. That is the beginning of many other things that follow.”

    David Beckmann became president of Bread for the World in 1991. He is an economist and a Christian clergyman（牧师）. Bread for the World organizes people from religious and non-religious groups to write, call and visit members of Congress（国会）. The purpose is to support measures to improve the lives of the poor. David Beckmann points to big increase in American development assistance. He said, “I think that would not have happened without the support of hundreds of thousands of people and churches that are part of Bread for the World and that keep the pressure on their members of Congress.” The prize committee also credited his efforts with helping to increase aid to needy families in the United States.

    1.The World Food Prize honors ________.

    A. people who fight against hunger

    B. researchers or top policy officials

    C. people from nongovernmental groups

    D. people who have advanced human development

    2.Why does Jo Luck receive the prize?

    A. Under her leadership, people develop roads and build schools.

    B. She has served Heifer International for almost 20 years.

    C. Under her leadership, Heifer International helps farmers in 50 countries.

    D. She makes the group’s budget grow to more than 130 million.

    3.What has David Beckmann done to deserve the prize?

    A. He has trained farmers in 50 countries.

    B. He has made a great contribution to science.

    C. He has led Bread for the World for more than 20 years.

    D. He has aimed to support measures to improve the lives of the poor.

     

    查看答案和解析>>

    科目：高中英语 来源：2013届四川攀枝花市高一月考英语卷 题型：阅读理解

      Just five minutes of exercise a day outdoors can improve mental health, according to a study.

       Researchers from the University of Essex, UK have found that as little as five minutes of a “green activity” such as walking, gardening, cycling or farming could help to improve mood and increase self-esteem (自信).

      Many studies have shown that outdoor exercise can reduce the risk of mental illness and improve a sense of well-being, but the new study, led by Jules Pretty and Jo Barton, was the first to determine how much time needed to be spent on green exercise for the benefits to show.

       Barton and Pretty looked at data from 1,252 people of different ages, genders (性别) and mental health status (情况) taken from 10 studies in Britain.

       They analyzed their different outdoor activities including walking, gardening, cycling, fishing, boating, horse-riding and farming in locations such as a park, garden or nature trail (路径).

       They found that the mental health changes were seen after just five minutes. With longer periods of time exercising in a green environment, the positive effects were more apparent.

       Looking at men and women of different ages, the researchers found the health changes were particularly strong in the young and the mentally ill.

       Green and blue

       A bigger effect was seen with exercise in an area that also contained water – such as a lake or river.

      “This is because historically we are drawn to water to survive and it is in our genetic (遗传的) make-up to be at one with nature,” the researchers wrote in their report.

       Pretty said those who were generally inactive, or stressed, or with mental illness would probably benefit the most from “green exercise”.

       “Employers, for example, could encourage staff in stressful workplaces to take a short walk at lunchtime in the nearest park to improve mental health.”

       He also said exercise programs outdoors could benefit youth offenders.

    1.How is the study this article refers to different from other studies?

      A. It involved more people.

      B. It took longer to finish the research.

      C. It determined the exact amount of time needed.

      D. It was led by just two researchers.

    2. What can we conclude from the findings of the study?

      A. Just five minutes of “green exercise” daily can help improve mental health.

      B. Gardeners and farmers do not need “green exercise”.

      C. Walking in a park with a lake will weaken the effect.

      D. “Green exercise” is not suitable for the mentally ill.

    3.. According to Pretty, _______ would probably benefit the most from “green exercise”.

      A. stressed, inactive people B. office workers

      C. youth offenders            D. women and children

    4. What is the main problem discussed in this article?

      A. Physical well-being.       B. Outdoor exercise.

      C. Mental illness.            D. Harmony with nature.

     

     

    查看答案和解析>>

    科目：高中英语 来源： 题型：阅读理解

    This year’s World Food Prize will honor two leaders of hunger-fighting groups based  in the United States. The winners are David Beckmann of Bread for the World and Jo Luck of Heifer International. They will share the prize of 250,000 dollars. The World Food Prize usually goes to researchers or top policy officials. This is the first time it will recognize the work of nongovernmental groups.
    Heifer International provides donated animals and training to farmers in 50 countries. Jo Luck remains president until next year. Under her leadership, the group’s budget grew from less than 10,000,000 dollars to more than 130,000,000 dollars. Jo Luck, “People pass on their gifts of not just animals but also gifts of training and leadership. We have seen cases where we have been gone 5 and 10 years and we go back and they have developed roads and built schools, and they have other communities receiving the animals and the training. You just give them those resources and that training and opportunity, and you cannot hold them back.” She told the story of a woman from a poor village in Zimbabwe. A family member helped send her to school in the United States with earnings from a donated milk goat. She received a doctoral degree. Jo Luck, “That is what a goat did. That is one example. The animal is only the catalyst（催化剂）. That is the beginning of many other things that follow.”
    David Beckmann became president of Bread for the World in 1991. He is an economist and a Christian clergyman（牧师）. Bread for the World organizes people from religious and non-religious groups to write, call and visit members of Congress（国会）. The purpose is to support measures to improve the lives of the poor. David Beckmann points to big increase in American development assistance. He said, “I think that would not have happened without the support of hundreds of thousands of people and churches that are part of Bread for the World and that keep the pressure on their members of Congress.” The prize committee also credited his efforts with helping to increase aid to needy families in the United States

    1. 1.

      The World Food Prize honors ________

      1. A.
        people who fight against hunger
      2. B.
        researchers or top policy officials
      3. C.
        people from nongovernmental groups
      4. D.
        people who have advanced human development
    2. 2.

      Why does Jo Luck receive the prize?

      1. A.
        Under her leadership, people develop roads and build schools
      2. B.
        She has served Heifer International for almost 20 years
      3. C.
        Under her leadership, Heifer International helps farmers in 50 countries
      4. D.
        She makes the group’s budget grow to more than 130 million
    3. 3.

      What has David Beckmann done to deserve the prize?

      1. A.
        He has trained farmers in 50 countries
      2. B.
        He has made a great contribution to science
      3. C.
        He has led Bread for the World for more than 20 years
      4. D.
        He has aimed to support measures to improve the lives of the poor

    查看答案和解析>>

    同步练习册答案