Question

Everybody is happy as his pay rises. Yet pleasure at your own can disappear if you learn that a fellow worker has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he is known as being lazy, you might even be quite cross. Such behavior is regarded as “all too human”, with the underlying belief that other animals would not be able to have this finely developed sense of sadness. But a study by Sarah Brosnan of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it is all too monkey, as well.
The researchers studied the behaviors of some kind of female brown monkeys. They look smart. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food happily. Above all, like female human beings, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males.
Such characteristics make them perfect subjects for Doctor Brosnan’s study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens (奖券) for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for pieces of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate and connected rooms, so that each other could observe what the other is getting in return for its rock, they became quite different.
In the world of monkeys，grapes are excellent goods (and much preferable to cucumbers). So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was not willing to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either shook her own token at the researcher, or refused to accept the cucumber. Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other room (without an actual monkey to eat it) was enough to bring about dissatisfaction in a female monkey.
The researches suggest that these monkeys, like humans, are guided by social senses. In the wild, they are co-operative and group-living. Such co-operation is likely to be firm only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of anger when unfairly treated, it seems, are not the nature of human beings alone. Refusing a smaller reward completely makes these feelings clear to other animals of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness developed independently in monkeys and humans, or whether it comes from the common roots that they had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question

1. 1.
   According to the passage, which of the following statements is TRUE?
   1. A.
      Only monkeys and humans can have the sense of fairness in the world
   2. B.
      In the wild, monkeys are never unhappy to share their food with each other
   3. C.
      Women will show more dissatisfaction than men when unfairly treated
   4. D.
      Monkeys can exchange cucumbers for grapes, for grapes are more attractive
2. 2.
   The underlined statement “it is all too monkey” means that ________
   1. A.
      monkeys are also angry with lazy fellows
   2. B.
      monkeys, like humans, tend to be envious of each other
   3. C.
      no animals other than monkeys can develop such feelings
   4. D.
      feeling angry at unfairness is also monkey’s nature
3. 3.
   Female monkeys of this kind are chosen for the research most probably because they are _________
   1. A.
      more likely to pay attention to the value of what they get
   2. B.
      attentive to researchers’ instructions
   3. C.
      nice in both appearance and behaviors
   4. D.
      more ready to help others than their male companions
4. 4.
   We can learn ________according to the passage?
   1. A.
      Human beings' feelings of anger are developed from the monkeys
   2. B.
      Cooperation between monkeys stays firm before the realization of being cheated
   3. C.
      In the research, male monkeys are less likely to exchange food with others
   4. D.
      Only monkeys and humans have the sense of fairness dating back to 35 million years ago
5. 5.
   What can we infer about the monkeys in Sarah’s study?
   1. A.
      The monkeys can be trained to develop social senses
   2. B.
      The monkeys may show their satisfaction with equal treatment
   3. C.
      They usually show their feelings openly as humans do
   4. D.
      Cooperation among the monkeys remains effective in the wild

Answer 1

CDABB
试题分析：本文是是一篇研究报告，介绍了猴子对于公平性的态度，和人类一样，如果受到公平的对待，那么会很合作。受到不公平的对待以后，人们会生气或者反抗等等。
1.C 推理题。根据第一段最后一句Above all, like female human beings, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males.说明女性比男性更加注意公平性这方面的问题，故C项正确。
2.D 推理题。根据第一段Indeed, if he is known as being lazy, you might even be quite cross. Such behavior is regarded as “all too human”, with the underlying belief that other animals would not be able to have this finely developed sense of sadness.suggests that it is all too monkey, as well.说明对于不公平感到生气行为在猴子里也是一样存在的，故D正确。
3.A 推理题。根据文章第一段最后3行They look smart. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food happily. Above all, like female human beings, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males.说明这种猴子更可能注意到自己的所受到的待遇问题，以及公平性的问题。故A正确。
4.B 推理题。根据最后一段2,3行Such co-operation is likely to be firm only when each animal feels it is not being cheated.说明猴子在感觉到北欺骗之前都是很合作的，如果感觉到自己被骗了，他就会不合作了，这由第二段中的实验也可以得知。故B正确。
5.B 推断题。根据Such co-operation is likely to be firm only when each animal feels it is not being cheated.说明如果他们被公平对待，那么他们会很满意很合作。故B正确。
考点：考查科学报告类短文阅读
点评：本文文章内容较难，要求考生有很强的中长句分析能力，考查推理题较多，要求考生在理解原文表面文字信息的基础上，做出一定判断和推论，从而得到文章的隐含意义和深层意义。推理题所涉及的内容可能是文中某一句话，也可是某几句话，但做题的指导思想都是以文字信息为依据，既不能做出在原文中找不到文字根据的推理，也不能根据表面文字信息做多步推理。推理题要根据原文表面文字信息一步推出的答案：即对原文某一句话或某几句话所作的同义改写(paraphrase)或综合。